This week in the UK, The NHS passed
legislation stating that any woman discovered to have a genital piercing,
either in the vulva or the clitoris will need to be reported as a victim of FGM
(female Genital Mutilation) and that the individual or establishment
responsible for the procedure can be prosecuted for performing it. Wait, I’m
sorry…what? This does not sit well with me. A western woman making the choice
to pierce her clitoris to increase sexual pleasure or to ornament her body is
not a victim.
I firmly believe you should be able to do
whatever you want to your own body. Brand it, tattoo it, pierce it. Or not, it’s
your choice. That is the core difference between opting to embellish your own
body and FGM. FGM takes the choice away from the woman whose body is being
mutilated. If we start including ornamentation under the mutilation umbrella,
it’s a slippery slope. What about lazer hair removal or tattoos on or near the
genitals? Again, these are elective cosmetic treatments that women are choosing
for themselves and what the NHS is saying, without actually saying it, with its
body policing, is that women can’t be trusted with that choice.
I’m a feminist, so I believe totally in
equality between the sexes. This is why I’m no fan of circumcision, despite
being Jewish. If a child is too young to consent, then the procedure should not
be carried out. It’s an unnecessary, painful tradition which damages the
genitals and is performed without permission. I consider circumcision MGM (Male
Genital Mutilation.) So why aren’t Brit Milahs being busted? And using the same logic as it's applying to women, why aren't Prince Albert and testicular piercings being
scrutinized by the NHS? What’s the difference? Why can men be trusted to make
choices about their bodies in this way, but women can’t?
Something is very wrong here. The NHS is
essentially equating a woman getting her clitoris hacked off with no anesthesia
in the kitchen of someone’s house to a putting a pretty little ring though your
labia, and that’s a dangerous comparison. It trivializes the trauma experienced
by real victims of FGM by equating it to the act of electing to walk into a sterile
tattoo parlor and pierce one’s vulva, which in no way irreparably damages the
sex organs. Also, and most importantly, it implies that victims of FGM have
some say in their procedure, and most do not.
More than 120 million women worldwide are
victims of FGM and I refuse to include Lady
Gaga and Janet
Jackson in those statistics. Get your shit together, NHS, surely you have better
things to do than look for victims where there aren't any. It's my vulva and my choice.